South Africa, Pharmaceuticals and Intellectual Property
From PHM Oz
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<center>''This page is under construction, please be patient as we develop it further''</center> | <center>''This page is under construction, please be patient as we develop it further''</center> | ||
| + | Government uses parallel importing to achieve cheaper drugs for AIDS. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 28 companies sue SA Govt. Massive outcry. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Development of TAC. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Role of MSF and CPTech. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Companies withdraw and pay Govt costs | ||
| + | |||
| + | Flow-on to April 2001 conference and differential pricing and then to Doha (December 2001) with its re-affirmation of compulsory licensing and for export (Doha Statement on Public Health). | ||
[[Intellectual Property and Pharmaceuticals|Back to IP home]] | [[Intellectual Property and Pharmaceuticals|Back to IP home]] | ||
Revision as of 03:57, 16 June 2007
Government uses parallel importing to achieve cheaper drugs for AIDS.
28 companies sue SA Govt. Massive outcry.
Development of TAC.
Role of MSF and CPTech.
Companies withdraw and pay Govt costs
Flow-on to April 2001 conference and differential pricing and then to Doha (December 2001) with its re-affirmation of compulsory licensing and for export (Doha Statement on Public Health).
