Trade and Health in the Pacific
DebGleeson (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| (31 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Forum on Trade and Health in the Pacific: | + | == Forum on Trade and Health in the Pacific: PACER Plus - Should we be worried? == |
| − | PACER Plus - Should we be worried? | + | |
| + | '''Melbourne, 12-13 April 2010''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | For background information see the resource page [[Pacer Plus: Should we be worried about the impact on health in the Pacific?]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | PHM Oz collaborated with the Institute for Human Security and the Public Health Association of Australia to organise a free public forum on trade and health in the Pacific, held in Melbourne on 12-13 April 2010. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://phmoz.org/wiki/images/c/c4/Trade%26HealthPacificMelbourneForumReport.pdf '''Download FINAL REPORT'''] | ||
| + | |||
| + | This forum brought together researchers, activists and health professionals from Australia and the Pacific to consider a range of health issues at stake in the current renegotiation of the Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER) as PACER Plus. | ||
| − | + | Sponsoring organisations and groups included: | |
| + | *The La Trobe University Institute for Human Security | ||
| + | *The Victorian Branch of the Public Health Association of Australia (PHAA) | ||
| + | *The Political Economy of Health, Primary Health Care and International Health Special Interest Groups of PHAA | ||
| + | |||
| + | Many people contributed to organising this event, which was coordinated by a working group comprising David Legge, Deb Gleeson, Paula O'Brien, Cassandra Fletcher and Wes Morgan. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Day 1 (12 April)''' included presentations by expert speakers from both Australia and Pacific Island Countries on health issues including: | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Nutrition and health in the Pacific | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Tobacco and alcohol exposure | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Implications of foreign investment in health care | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Labour mobility and ‘brain drain’ | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Economic development and health | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Gender inequality | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Day 2 (13 April)''' involved small group discussions focused on planning for research and advocacy. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://phmoz.org/wiki/images/d/da/Trade%26HealthForumFlyer_Version2.pdf '''Download Flyer'''] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://phmoz.org/wiki/images/3/33/ForumProgramFINAL.pdf '''Download Final Program'''] | ||
Latest revision as of 04:25, 9 May 2010
[edit] Forum on Trade and Health in the Pacific: PACER Plus - Should we be worried?
Melbourne, 12-13 April 2010
For background information see the resource page Pacer Plus: Should we be worried about the impact on health in the Pacific?
PHM Oz collaborated with the Institute for Human Security and the Public Health Association of Australia to organise a free public forum on trade and health in the Pacific, held in Melbourne on 12-13 April 2010.
This forum brought together researchers, activists and health professionals from Australia and the Pacific to consider a range of health issues at stake in the current renegotiation of the Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER) as PACER Plus.
Sponsoring organisations and groups included:
- The La Trobe University Institute for Human Security
- The Victorian Branch of the Public Health Association of Australia (PHAA)
- The Political Economy of Health, Primary Health Care and International Health Special Interest Groups of PHAA
Many people contributed to organising this event, which was coordinated by a working group comprising David Legge, Deb Gleeson, Paula O'Brien, Cassandra Fletcher and Wes Morgan.
Day 1 (12 April) included presentations by expert speakers from both Australia and Pacific Island Countries on health issues including:
- Nutrition and health in the Pacific
- Tobacco and alcohol exposure
- Implications of foreign investment in health care
- Labour mobility and ‘brain drain’
- Economic development and health
- Gender inequality
Day 2 (13 April) involved small group discussions focused on planning for research and advocacy.
